We are currently accepting submissions from all current law students for The Common Law Volume 59, Issue 1 (Fall 2025)
The Common Law serves as a forum for shorter works, including abridged notes and seminar papers. The chosen works will go through an abridged editing process and will be published on the JLSP website. Due to the shortened editorial timeline, this is an excellent opportunity to publish work that is time-sensitive or especially newsworthy.
Submissions must be 20-30 pages, double-spaced in size 12, Times New Roman font. Thorough citations and Bluebooking will be considered in the selection process. The pieces must address a social issue of some type. Submissions are due August 20th, 2025, at 11:59 pm.
To apply, please send the following via email to Abby Thompson at att2148@columbia.edu:
- First and Last Name
- Law School Email
- Title of Piece
- A brief abstract of your piece (300 words max)
- Why do you want this work to be published? What role do you see it playing (i.e., novel scholarship, informing practitioners, policy advocacy)?
- An attached copy of your piece in a Word document
Penetrating FDA Regulation: Justifications for FDA Oversight of Sex “Toys” as Medical Devices
By Tyler Henry Sex devices, commonly referred to as “toys,” have grown in popularity over the past decade and somehow evaded regulations from consumer protection agencies. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has no specific regulatory standards for sex devices, regulating them as “novelty toys.” And the Food and Drug […]
Nonprofit Law’s Antidiscrimination Loophole: Applying a Renewed Private Benefit Standard to Name, Image, and Likeness Collectives
By Kristen Popham America’s rapidly expanding and politically influential nonprofit sector is under increased scrutiny, and nonprofit law has yet to provide answers to critics’ burning questions. If the nonprofit sector is born of a democratic commitment to pluralism and community linkages, what do we make of its contributions to […]
Caregivers as a Class: Considering Antidiscrimination Protections for Caregivers
By Sonia Marton Unpaid caregiving is an enormous element of life for millions of Americans. But caregivers too often suffer discrimination in the paid workplace due to the real or perceived demands of their care work outside of it. Despite this inequality, employment antidiscrimination statutes do not protect caregivers explicitly. […]
The City of (Big) Brotherly Love: Examining the Federal and State Constitutional Implications of Real-Time Crime Center Surveillance in Philadelphia
By Mary Gianna Hill The rise of Real-Time Crime Centers (RTCCs) in the United States, including their implementation in Pennsylvania, marks a significant development in law enforcement surveillance. These centers employ advanced technologies to conduct real-time monitoring of the public. While the primary aim of RTCCs is to enhance public […]
Aberration of Accountability: Situating the Alien Tort Statute Against Corporate Human Rights Abuses
By Sabriyya Pate The Alien Tort Statute (ATS), one of the United States’ oldest laws, provides all federal district courts with general jurisdiction to hear cases brought by non–United States citizens. As written, the ATS empowers non– United States citizens—including victims of torture, kidnapping, forced labor, and child slavery—to sue […]
High-Frequency Litigation: Framing the Narrative of ADA Actions
By Amanda McBain A sharp rise in the filing of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III actions between 2013 and 2021 has furthered the “for-profit” lore surrounding arguments against the standing of serial litigants. Critics have construed the mere propensity of ADA litigants to settle their lawsuits as the […]
One Size Does Not Fit All: Reforming the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ Terrorism Enhancement
By Anaximander Mars Following the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, Congress directed the U.S. Sentencing Commission to amend its Sentencing Guidelines to prescribe a steeper penalty for acts that involve or intend to promote international terrorism. The result is the terrorism sentencing enhancement, which automatically sets a floor […]
Searching for Judges Who Hear: Analyzing the Effects of Colorado’s Abolition of Qualified Immunity on Civil Rights Litigation
By Colin Cowperthwaite “Section 1983 was born out of the failures of state courts. Over a hundred years later, [Colorado’s Enhance Law Enforcement Integrity Act (ELEIA)] was born out of the failures of federal courts to protect individuals from civil rights violations committed by local law enforcement. By removing qualified […]
State Constitutions and Systemic Gaps in Music Education Access
By Corey Whitt “The proliferation of music education in schools throughout the United States is an apparent success. However, its application is not evenly spread across the country. Students living in poverty are most often those who are left unable to enjoy its advantages. Further, the disparities increase along racial […]
Access to Justice in “Lawyerless” Housing Courts: A Discussion of Potential Systemic and Judicial Reforms
By Gabe Siegel “Housing courts—and lawyerless courts more broadly—are broken. Only one side has access to lawyers. And given the institutional expertise, strategic knowledge, and unfair use of procedure that housing court lawyers bring, only one side has genuine access to justice. By changing the ways in which judges interact […]